One reason why the LLM playing field is kind of levelled and “being first” isn’t all too meaningful, is that the research was already out there for quite some time before the hype started.

The hype got kicked off, when these large corporations figured out that pouring lots of money into this approach does something. Well, and when there were lots of cheap GPUs on the market from cryptocurrencies imploding.

But as soon as the hype was there, getting investors to give you lots of money and getting GPUs, that’s something virtually any company could do.

Having said all that, the other points still stand and they probably could’ve held their position without even being the best platform. Nevermind especially that Microsoft is most certainly getting lots and lots of investment money for LLMs, too.

Also seems to have moobs. Or very bushy armpits. Certainly one of the two.

Did not expect that kind of law change from such an aggressively Conservative government. I guess, there is ample reason to put the NIMBYs into overdrive, though…

Don’t think, Grok was a thing yet back then…

“City limits” sure is one of the signs of all time.

I do feel like AI art has entered the boomer stage of the hype cycle, as in Trump et al use it prominently, so the kids start to think, it’s

.

But I also feel like the blog post conflates two aspects. It’s not just about AI art, it’s also about every goddamn brainfart being turned into AI art.
No one needs to see a t-rex giving a thumbs-up or similar.

That’s what people are tired of, for sure. In the before times, the person would’ve chuckled at the thought and then forgotten about it. It took long enough to create an image of it, that they had time to realize that no one cares.
That barrier is now removed, so you definitely see posts online with just the dumbest brainfart turned into pixels.

I had to start reading that three times over, because I saw they mentioned “Canadian” and just assumed the angle brackets are a joke in reference to the Canadians in South Park:

Yeah, even just having more different ingredients and spices available makes those recipes of old somewhat obsolete. But then you also have the internet to tell you all kinds of new recipes, so if the local cuisine isn’t great to begin with, it is easier than ever to not bother with it.

The mushrooms worry me the most. There’s sizeable gaps between them, which seem to have been filled up entirely with whatever the white stuff is…

Yeah, and even when you do taste a difference, it’s rarely actually bad. Usually, it’s just a different hint of something in the overall taste. If you make the dish often, those variations are actually good, because it makes it more interesting.

Might’ve been beetroot. It’s excellent at coloring things pink and also used as a food dye…

Did you maybe accidentally turn on the “drunk” mode at the top?

Hmm, that’s interesting. Don’t you guys generally use concrete for paving in the US? In building construction, you’re supposed to give concrete like a month to fully harden, even though it already looks firm after a day or so.

For paving, they’re likely using a hardening accelerator, so the timelines wouldn’t be the same, but if building construction is anything to go by, it seems like you’d want to give it as much time as possible, not send cars on there while it’s still hot. 🥴

A bucket of bytes. 🙃

deleted by creator

I imagine, this is more about software devs than sysadmins. Sure, you’ll hire a couple more sysadmins to help with the massive user growth during the pandemic. But especially combined with loans basically being made free in the same time, it’s suddenly worth hiring a bunch of devs to build the Next Big Thing™.

Once those loans start costing again and the user numbers fall off, you quickly have lots of devs that you can’t find tasks for, that are worth doing.

A flork of cows? I hear, you have to license their works…

Also worth mentioning that universities generally see themselves as research facilities first and foremost. They teach students, because they want to get the next generation of researchers.

Sure, they’ll also do job training to some degree, because it’s a good argument to get more funding, but yeah, just not their primary goal.

I feel like direct marketing will become a lot more important.

AI-generated books flooding Amazon is already a thing. And even if AI at some point becomes capable of writing good books, I don’t see there being much of an incentive to stop flooding online stores with shitty AI-generated books. Because customers will have a hard time knowing what’s good and what’s not upfront.

At the same time, though, customers won’t be happy about this as a whole. Online book stores that don’t curate will stop being useful. Those customers will look for online stores which curate, or for authors on social media.
If you post e.g. on Mastodon, talking about your writing process and all that, people looking for a non-shitty book will take a look.

What you consider successful is an entirely different question, though. Even before LLMs, it was virtually impossible to earn a living wage with writing…

You’re right that there is a risk, that rebasing introduces compile errors or even subtle breakages. The thing is, version control works best, if you keep the number of different versions to a minimum. That means merging back as soon as possible. And rebases simultaneously help with that, but also definitely work best when doing that.

There may be reasons why you cannot merge back quickly, typically organizational reasons why your devs can’t establish close-knit communication to avoid conflicts that way, or just not enough automation in testing. In that case, merges may be the right choice.
But I will always encourage folks to merge back as soon as possible, and if you can bring down the lifetime of feature branches (or ideally eliminate them entirely), then rebases are unlikely to introduces unintended changes and speed you up quite a bit.