I tried to RCS with my brother today (iPhone user). I told him to set it up properly and… It didn’t work. SMS are still sent.
I tried to RCS with my brother today (iPhone user). I told him to set it up properly and… It didn’t work. SMS are still sent.
Arch Linux. All the software at their latest version (which is usually the best one), within a couple of commands, either from the huge official repos or the AUR.
One of the reasons surely is that it’s getting banned from government software 😅
Yep, these are the measures that keep the underworld locked for the rich and I am tired of pretending it’s not.
Seems like the comeback of a more sane system. I just wish they stopped using so many circles or such huge rounded corners that enforce smaller and smaller text and icons.
In my experience (not in Android apps but in Arch Linux updates) parallel downloads are almost always waaay faster. Magnitudes faster. Using multiple cores? Is it the bottleneck actually enforced by the server? I don’t know, I just know it works.
And if they did it, it’s because it works on Android too.
¿Por qué solo tres?
3 years only
Or you can preinstall micro
like you preinstall everything else 😅
And all the shortcuts are SANE, not the weird thing of nano
In every post of this kind I am amazed at so many people using nano
instead of micro
which is SO MUCH BETTER while being the same thing at the same time.
AI doesn’t do feelings
How can I have a serious conversation with these annoying answers? Come on, you know what I am talking about. Even an AI chatbot would know what I mean.
Any AI chatbot, even “general purpose” ones will read your code and will return a description of what it does if you ask it.
And particularly AI would be great at catching “useless”, “weird” or unexplainable code in a repository. Maybe not with the current levels of context. But that’s what I want to know, if these tools (or anything similar) exist yet.
Thank you.
Of course, 100% reliability is impossible even with human reviewers. I just want a tool that gives me at least something, cause I don’t have the time or knowledge to review a full repo before executing it on my machine.
I just want a report that says “we detected in line 27 or file X, a particular behavior that feels weird as it tries to upload your environment variables into some unexpected URL”.
I’m afraid to tell you that your e-book deDRMing is very much considered piracy. 😅
Piracy is easier than ever IMO. 20 years ago it was messy, and full of viruses and fake content. Nowadays there’s plug&play pirate services with refined content.
There’s so much people in the world today convinced that their subscriptions are worth it that I think they’ll let pirates coexist in peace, because they know pirates wouldn’t pay for it anyways.
I don’t care if the solution is AI based or not, indeed.
I guess I thought it like that because AI is quite fit for the task of understanding what might be the purpose of code in a few seconds/minutes without you having to review it. I don’t know how some non-AI tool could be better for such task.
Edit: so many people against the idea. Have you guys used GitHub Copilot? It understands the context of your repo to help you write the next thing… Right? Well, what if you apply the same idea to simply review for malicious/unexpected behaviour on third party repos? Doesn’t seem too weird for me.
I am a fan of Python’s or Rust’s official conventions.
For package names, tho, I don’t get why this-is-used over this_clearly_better_system, as I would expect a double click to select_the_whole_thing, whereas it does-not-happen-here.
It’s really so sad to see how marketing alone can shape the landscape even when they 🍎 are scamming their users so hard.
Mine sure has it enabled. Been using RCS for years. Will lookup my brother’s, but I thought we were already past that phase