Explain it to me like I’m five

You don’t have to use it? 🤷‍♀️

My question comes from anyone can make a thing with ai, but is that “good enough” to that “creator” or will traditional artists still have a role becaude it isn’t

I mean from the standpoint that anyone can generate an image, but not everyone can “make it look right.”

Do the right thing. Use FOSS.

Alcoholism is a disease. Driving is a privilege

Still that’s not the same as going through tsa or being kicked off your flight

That’s a very good point

I have a little more hope for future generations. Regardless of if you are primarily using ai to speed up a traditional work flow or vibe coding, there still are more and less effective ways to get things done. I’ve found if I write sonething I’m familiar with like bash or Python, I “know enough” to write functions and refactor incrementally. It’s a methodical process which produces code better than I can write by myself in less time.

Compare that to when I write Lisp. There it’s more or less throw shit at the wall until I somewhat get what I want. It takes longer and can be next to impossible to extend or effectively refactor.

Based on that observation of myself, I think we’ll find two (and probably more) kinds of programmers in the future. Ones who use it as an assistant to speed up a traditional workflow, and those who produce the slop that we are afraid of.

Perhaps to give us any amount of additional hope/comparison to now. There still have been people who have programmed now who create slop. And that comes to the way we use references like stack exchange or the Arch Wiki. Are you copy and pasting while learning what things mean and learning in the process? Or are you just stringing things together to get results at all? I don’t think we would argue those references made all of us worse.

So I think it’s an apt concern, but we’ll have to wait to see what it’s like whole sale. I was a doubter for a long time, but I’ve come to understand where Torvalds et al are coming from.

This is largely an oversimplification because it depends on how you use AI in the first place. Are you building modularly and incrementally? Or are you letting it ride on black?

I don’t think it is as popular with the younger crowd. It’s a battle royal like fortnite but it’s more of a “military shooter” than a “fantasy shooter”. It’s what you’d get if you crossed fortnite and counterstrike

There is also a “free” version of minecraft for raspberry pi which presumably can be ported

And why should they? The bottom line is the bottom line. It doesn’t make any business sense to spend money to change your anti cheat mechanism so you can capture a tiny group of users. The incentive just isn’t there

Wouldn’t pubg be a better choice in terms of game style?

You could just forbid them from playing it 😂 or use a vm with gpu passthrough. Idk how setting that up is anymore, but it used to be a bit of a bear

edit: I forgot about kernel level anti cheat. Propaganda might be your only option ✊

edit edit Xbox cloud gamepass! https://linuxvox.com/blog/xbox-game-pass-linux/

I use invidious, but there’s come a point, after 3 or 4 tries, I just use the embedded link. Privacy is like security. Make it as hard for the other person as possible without making it impossible for yourself

I like the one what looks like a pealed orange personally

Would you call that a Kitty cat? 🐈

From splooge

A bag of books?