It is ‘nearly unavoidable’ that AI will cause a financial crash within a decade, SEC head says::undefined

  • I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    But AI as it exists right now

    That’s the fallacy. We aren’t talking about AI right now but rather what AI is going to look like 4-5 years from now. Think about how much advancement has happened in just the last year. Last year, ChatGPT was barely a thing, and image generation was little better than vague, blobby shapes that took a lot of computing power to create.

    It’s absurd to talk about “AI as it exists right now” because within months, “right now” will be horribly outdated.

    • Naatan@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      But that’s plain fantasy at this point. The current form of AI is fundamentally not intelligent. Advancement of the current form of AI won’t change that.

      The current form of AI is like the speech center of your brain. On its own it does not constitute a brain, nor will it ever “evolve” to be its own brain.

      So the current form of AI may end up forming a small part of the whole, but that whole is as of yet still a fantasy.

        • Naatan@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this context I’d imagine you meant what the technology could evolve into. But what I’m saying is the technology is fundamentally incapable of being intelligent.

          I imagine you think of “the technology” as just artificial intelligence in general. I’m talking about the actual technology in todays “ai”. The inner workings.