0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoOh, come on!sh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1882arrow-down118
arrow-up1864arrow-down1external-linkOh, come on!sh.itjust.works0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoI did not think there was that much to tightening. I read the whole damn thing.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-22 months agoIf you love that, NASA has a whole 100 page PDF about fasteners: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19900009424/downloads/19900009424.pdf One particularly notable part is about split lock washers. They’re useless, often detrimental, and need to go away. NASA said so in 1990 and there’s no reason to think this has changed.
I did not think there was that much to tightening. I read the whole damn thing.
If you love that, NASA has a whole 100 page PDF about fasteners:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19900009424/downloads/19900009424.pdf
One particularly notable part is about split lock washers. They’re useless, often detrimental, and need to go away. NASA said so in 1990 and there’s no reason to think this has changed.