irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to [MIGRATED TO DIFFERENT INSTANCE CHECK PIN POST] Internet is Beautiful@lemm.eeEnglish · 5 months agoIs this a coup? Home of the Coup-o-meteristhisacoup.comexternal-linkmessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1301arrow-down110cross-posted to: internetisbeautiful@piefed.social
arrow-up1291arrow-down1external-linkIs this a coup? Home of the Coup-o-meteristhisacoup.comirelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to [MIGRATED TO DIFFERENT INSTANCE CHECK PIN POST] Internet is Beautiful@lemm.eeEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square33linkfedilinkcross-posted to: internetisbeautiful@piefed.social
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-24 months agoThat’s why I’m not counting everyone, just the people that voted. Winning the popular vote just means winning a plurality of the votes. He got more votes than Harris. Once you account for all the other candidates, though, his total comes out to less than 50% of all the people that voted. No one got a majority. And in many countries if no one gets a majority there is a runoff. This is another structural problem that the US has.
That’s why I’m not counting everyone, just the people that voted.
Winning the popular vote just means winning a plurality of the votes. He got more votes than Harris. Once you account for all the other candidates, though, his total comes out to less than 50% of all the people that voted. No one got a majority.
And in many countries if no one gets a majority there is a runoff. This is another structural problem that the US has.
Got it. Thanks for explaining.