Nucleo’s investigation identified accounts with thousands of followers with illegal behavior that Meta’s security systems were unable to identify; after contact, the company acknowledged the problem and removed the accounts

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Banning the tech, banning generated cp on the internet or banning it at home?

    I’m a big advocate of AI and don’t personally want any kind of banning or censorship of the tools.

    I don’t think it should be published on any kind of image sharing sites. I don’t hold people publishing it in high regard and I’m not against some kind of consequence. I generally view prison as unproductive though.

    At home, I’m not sure. People imo can do what they want behind closed doors. I don’t want any kind of surveillance but I don’t know how I would react if it got brought up at a trial, as a kind of proof if the allegations have something to do with that theme (child molestation).

    I also don’t think we need much of a reason to ban it on the web.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It would probably make me distrust the prosecution, like if they’re bringing this up they must not have much to go on. Like every time a black man is shot by police they bring up that he smoked weed.

      I guess my main complaint is that it’s insane to view it as equivalent to real CP, and it’s harmful to waste any resources prosecuting it.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That’s fair. We can also expect proper moderation from social media sites. I’m okay with a light touch but It shouldn’t be floating around if you get what I mean.