• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So what I’m understanding is that it’s only piracy if I don’t have an LLM to feed the books to?

    • Zatore@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think what it’s saying is that using the books for training is fine, but only if you legally purchased a copy. Downloading the books to avoid paying the author is definitely illegal. So that part of the ruling seems slightly misleading as we knew that part.

      • gex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        So can I buy a copy of, say, The Da Vinci Code, use it to train “DaVinci-GPT”, a model trained to recite all chapters of the book and distribute that model for free?

        • bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Correct. From the ruling you don’t pirate the book and from other rulings that I remember, AI output can’t be copyrighted on their own. Neat isn’t it?