• Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’ve found with this type of text that if I try to read it normally, I struggle to process the change between the start and end of each word, and read much more slowly. If I try to read quickly though, it flows, as if I’m skimming the words but still understanding them properly.

    It’s a very strange feeling :)

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Yeah I had a Firefox plugin earlier that turned all text to bionic, and I loved and hated it at the same time

      Especially since it feels like you’re reading in 1fps. It feels like stuttering

      • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s a loosening of control, I think. Let the wheel turn on its own, you’re still there to steer as needed, but let the inertia do the work. 🤓

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I think it was bionic reader.

          I don’t want to link to the plugin, since I don’t really know if it’s safe to use so evaluate yourself

    • degen@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Oddly enough, I find myself processing text with a regular font in both ways from time to time. Sometimes it flows like I’m reading half of the words but still absorbing every bit. Other times I notice the end of a paragraph and can’t tell you what I just read.

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    9 days ago

    I can read it twice as fast and remember less than half of it.

    My reading speed was never the problem. It’s the reading comprehension and memory that limits me.

      • Nelots@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        God, this used to annoy me so bad. I’d read the same three paragraphs over and over again, only for my mind to wander immediately every time. I’ve since come to appreciate it though, because my mind usually wanders off to think about potential scenarios in the book I’m actively reading.

        Like what two characters might say if they were to have a conversation about something specific, or even how the current situation I’m trying to read about might progress (instead of just focusing on the damn words that give me that answer, thanks brain). Time spent daydreaming about a story I enjoy isn’t time wasted IMO.

        Though, it’s admittedly still very annoying when I’m trying to read something boring like a science or news article.

        • bier@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s also kind of cool how your brain can both process text and wander off.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      For me, it’s both your points as well as a matter of current distractions. The real test would be if I could read/write something like this while somebody in the room has an unrelated conversation. Will it still hold my attention without the spoken words around me distracting me? Sadly, I have my doubts.

  • accideath@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    10 days ago

    I love this in principle but I can’t use it myself. I‘m a very fast reader by default, basically already doing what the highlighting tries to make you do, without it needing to be there. The highlighting disrupts that for me. I end up stopping at every word and partially jumping back and forth. I do show this to people on occasion that aren’t as lucky as me with their reading speed and most said it helped them. Not all though.

    • cobn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      it slowed my reading in the same way.

      Felt wierd realy, like I couldn’t read ahead while my inner voice was “saying” it.

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        For me, it completely messed up my whole-word and multi-word reading by shape. Like, I don’t read by syllable because I’m not pronouncing the words, I’m just reading the meaning of the whole word directly from the shape of the whole word (or several words), if that makes sense?

        Like, when I’m reading, my inner monologue is only “saying” a handful of key words in each sentence, as it fluidity skips over “mentally pronouncing” all the filler/context words.

        This completely breaks that. It splits each word into two chunks, neither of which is the word, so I need to show down to “mentally say” both chunks of each word to read them. Like, it’s still fast, I guess, but I’d estimate it slows me down by ⅓-½ish and disrupts my reading comprehension significantly.

        I assume that if I read like that for a few hours, I’d likely get used to it, but why bother?

        On the other hand, I think that could be a great reading tool, I imagine especially for people with dyslexia, but probably most fluent but slow readers.

      • degen@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’ve sort of always read that way, inner voice and all. When I learned that really fast readers figure out how to ignore that, or do it naturally, my mind was blown.

      • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Can you expand on that? I have never been a fast reader and speed reading takes the pleasure out of it for me. So, mainly story books, I read at the same pace as a speaker might say them outloud. As if my minds voice is reading them allowed in a chair to the child me setting quietly on the ground. Speed reading feels like watching a show in fast-forward. Great for boring parts but not enjoyable to me.

        How does your inner voice feel as you read?

  • chocrates@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    This “tech” has been out for a while but I don’t know that we can easily get it on our phones and computers for general reading :(.

    Anyone know?

    • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s a bionic reader extension for Firefox that works on mobile, but obvs that only works on webpages

    • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      I don’t know specifically of any piece of tech that does this, but it would be very very easy to code as a plugin for a book reader app or something like that. It’d be more difficult to do well in more complicated text or mixed media, like spreadsheets, PDFs, or browser pages, since you probably don’t want every piece of text on the page to have the effect.

    • salvagedrifter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Librera on fdroid also has this feature (but not referred to as “bionic”)

      Settings > Advanced Settings > Highlighting Initial Letters

    • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is absolutely gibberish. I have to solve a puzzle for every word. Yes, I can read it. The puzzles are compelling. I must solve each one even though i know what it is going to try and tell me. No, I cannot just read this.

  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m skeptical about how much the bolding makes people read faster vs placebo of just telling people they should be reading faster. Also as other people stated, comprehension is what counts.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t think it’s supposed to be. I think it’s just supposed to be easier for people who don’t have the ADHD that lets them read a book cover to cover while calling deep vein thrombosis a punk ass bitch who wouldn’t dare

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m not ADHD, but that particular passage using that particular font and those particular colors seemed to speed up my ability to read the text. But when Staments posted below (https://lemmy.zip/post/45655234/20636698) using what looks like the same methodology, it ended up being an impediment. I struggled to even get through the first sentence.

    So I have to wonder if there’s more to it than just randomly putting a character or few in bold at the start of each word – like maybe it’s also highly dependent on things like the font being use and making sure to use specific words and phrases that are conducive to this technique.

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      To be fair, when I open that link, I get light gray text on a dark brown-or-yellow-greyish background which isn’t that easily readable for me - at least contrast wise.