The answer is: “The Dandelion Girl” by Robert F. Young, thanks to a now deleted post below.
I started reading this at work a couple weeks ago, but wasn’t able to finish it at the time. Got a light morning, so I was trying to find it again, but to no avail.
I have a sneaking suspicion of the twist the story was building towards, but I wasn’t sure how the author was going to pull it off, as it seemed to be a textbook time travel paradox.
I thought the title might have something to do with flowers, but including that in my searches did not yield results, even after filtering out all of the “Flowers for Algernon” results, so I might be wrong.


It’s definitely possible I misinterpreted the sentiment - I’ll highlight some of the phrases that gave me that impression.
Again, as a third party, these certainly come across as you saying that the community is diminished by using AI to find the answers, and that the original respondent was wrong to do so. I don’t think that relies on a particularly uncharitable reading.
I saw the original reply - it didn’t say that you “should use ChatGPT instead of posting here”. It did say that you can use AI to easily answer questions like these, but there was nothing saying that you should use it - just that you could use it.
Anyway, this is a crazy thing to be arguing over. You say you didn’t mean any harm by it, so I’ll take your word for it. There’s enough horrible stuff in the world at the moment without the need for online fighting.
I’m going to tap out now. You’re not blocked, and I’ll read whatever you reply with, but I don’t think there’s much more I can add to this now.
Yeah, that’s definitely how it came across to me too. You’re not alone there