Yes. And in doing so, by showing that their doctrine can be creatively interpreted to mean whatever and affirm their own ideology, they demonstrate that their foundational text is not divinely inspired; if it were, it would have a singular meaning understood by anyone and everyone who read it.
Instead we have 40,000-ish separate denominations of Christianity, most of whom see themselves as uniquely valid and the other branches as deliberately false.
Yes. And in doing so, by showing that their doctrine can be creatively interpreted to mean whatever and affirm their own ideology, they demonstrate that their foundational text is not divinely inspired; if it were, it would have a singular meaning understood by anyone and everyone who read it.
Instead we have 40,000-ish separate denominations of Christianity, most of whom see themselves as uniquely valid and the other branches as deliberately false.