VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 months agoWell actually...lockdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square76linkfedilinkarrow-up1562arrow-down1114file-text
arrow-up1448arrow-down1imageWell actually...lockdiscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square76linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarePixel_Jock_17@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·2 months agoIt definitely is generalizing all men by the sentence structure, sometimes “men’s”, which men? Oh just “men” in general. But otherwise yeah, 100% “some” men’s egos are fragile. Its generalized because it doesn’t make a case to isolate a sub-group of men.
minus-squareWren@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·2 months ago“Sometime men egos can be fragile” is a weird sentence.
minus-squarevelma@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down7·2 months agoWhich men? Men whose egos are fragile. You can acknowledge that some men are like that without being one of them yourself.
It definitely is generalizing all men by the sentence structure, sometimes “men’s”, which men? Oh just “men” in general.
But otherwise yeah, 100% “some” men’s egos are fragile. Its generalized because it doesn’t make a case to isolate a sub-group of men.
“Sometime men egos can be fragile” is a weird sentence.
Which men? Men whose egos are fragile. You can acknowledge that some men are like that without being one of them yourself.