• Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I already did read it. Now go back and read what I said. Your daughter can still be gay and she can have children. You have lost nothing.

      Edit: Also, you don’t have to be a condescending jerk when you’re the one missing the point while assuming that I missed yours.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s aggravating. It feels like people look for adversaries constantly.

        Two gay people have a child, one of those people won’t have genes in common with that kid.

        That’s not the real point though, the point is that silly primitive fears are silly.

        You want to dance around calling me a bigot for whatever reason, so hey, naturally I come back as a condescending jerk.

        It is no wonder we can’t get people on our side if we’re poring over lesser points to call people bigots.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          First off, I didn’t call you a bigot. I said that blaming a lack of children on her being gay is bigoted.

          Second of all, based on this, you seem to be the one looking for adversaries. You’re the one who posted this.

          Lastly, I get the point of primitive fears being silly. I wasn’t disputing that or arguing against it in any way. I’m asking why you even have the fear to begin with. You didn’t say anything about the gay people’s genes before. You said something about your wife’s genes stopping with her only child. The situation with your wife’s genes are the same whether your daughter is gay or not.