• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I accept that she wasn’t referencing the historical meaning on purpose. She likely wasn’t a classic Nazi trying to dog whistle. However, not recognizing the phrase is concerning. Especially given the current rise of Nazi-compatible ideology in power.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If she didn’t mean it that way, I don’t see how it’s concerning. A lot of people display swastikas with no intention of referring to Nazis. The words “final” and “solution” aren’t owned by Nazi Germany into perpetuity.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Not knowing a specific phrase isn’t exactly unheard of. And a person using it to mean something else isn’t a Nazi.

          Not sure if you’re trolling or just a fucking idiot.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            I didn’t say they were a Nazi. And I thought you might be trolling because " A lot of people display swastikas with no intention of referring to Nazis." sounds risible.

              • jtrek@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I know it has a history. That’s not the same as “a lot of people” still use it for other meaning today. If you see a swastika, you can be pretty confident what they mean