• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      If the comic then had an egg asking “why would you say that?” you’d have a point.

      The comic has a sea lion fully capable of speech, and a person saying “I do not like this clearly sentient creature, because they bother me when I say I don’t like them as a whole.”

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          My point is you could change “Sea lion” to any minority, change the sea lion itself to that minority, and the comic does not lose all meaning. It can be interpreted as someone saying “I do not like (group)” and then being harassed by a member of that group while they repeatedly say nothing but “go away”. A racist could read this and think “Damn straight, I should be allowed to say I don’t like (race) without being harassed for it!”

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              With “pedophile” or “murderer” the evidence for them having done harm is self evident. In the comic the reasoning for disliking sea lions is not self evident, and the comic could be easily interpreted as “I should be allowed to say I don’t like any group I want and not have to defend myself.”

              • Ech@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Just wanna say thanks for holding the torch here. You pretty much echoed any response I would’ve made if I’d had the time, but probably better XD Sorry you got the brunt of the hate.