Removed by mod

Removed by mod

I don’t give a single fuck about what they … use.

I thought you minded they allegedly used slave labor.

USA … don’t bother my freedom or try to take over the world like fucking cartoon villains

Did I hallucinate all those military bases and imperialist wars?

I dislike China in general.

I’m sure they dislike the phones you make, too.

That looks like a cigarette.

I call shenanigans!

Perhaps, but they are cheeky and fun-loving.

I refuse to respect corporations like I respect human beings, and I don’t think they deserve human rights or the influence they have over our government.

I don’t think corporations are people either. You and I agree on that.

I do think I was correct in my read of the OP screenshot as indicating a desire to own and profit of the labor of a “person”—a position which should be examined and the underpinnings of which roundly rejected.

At a base level it’s the same underpinning that inform people’s desire to be landlords.

Why is the entire burden of proof on me? Shouldn’t you have to prove I’ve never called a real person an “NPC?”

No, I shouldn’t. I never claimed it was a particularly fair bet. Probably should check the terms before accepting.

No, just when I find it humorous.

You find dehumanizing others humorous? You should work on being less terrible.

And I’d take that bet ;)

Prove you never have and I’d pay you, otherwise I will forward you a list of charities you can send your loss to. sarcastic smiley

Called it. You’re a bot.

Do you always dehumanize those who disagree with you?

€6 says you’ve used the term “NPC” pejoratively.

Human rights don’t extend to machines.

Humans are machines. If ones made of metal become sentient why wouldn’t they have rights?

A “person” isn’t always a human. I care about humans, not whatever our current legal system calls a “person.”

Things are declared “persons” to confer them rights. Person in the OP wants a thing to be conferred rights but still own the profit gleaned from its labor (to the exclusion I should add of the rest of humanity).

Fuck the person in the screen cap.

Again, we’re talking about using technology to make human lives better.

No, we are talking about a private individual owning persons and profiting off their labor.

I think they meant a “legal person,”

And I think the kind of asshole who makes a pronoun joke is pining to benefit from enslavement.

Regardless, they clearly desire to reap where others sowed which is dickish.

No, I think it’s weird you’re equating slavery with using software and machinery

Guy in the OP is the one who said they wished AI would be declared "person"s so they could adopt own them and profit off their labor while sipping drinks.

Think you may have replied to the wrong post, buddy.

I’d like to see an LLM get clear and non-conflicting requirements from a customer.

Are you “a people person”?

Clearly dude is just making a joke.

The one.

S…slavery?

Replace “latte” with “mint julep” and the fantasy you’re describing is being a plantation slaver.