The tech industry is effectively exclusively based in IP law, but to create LLMs they felt comfortable to completely ignore IP laws, and they will sue you if you would break IP law that favors them.

I think you are right and yet so wrong.

My problems with ai aren’t unique and I am no special snowflake who see through the matrix while everyone else is distracted. I am just a dude. I really doubt that the points tell I will bring up, is anything boring as generic arguments against ai.

My problem with data theft is not based on the concern that artists has the rights on their work. I want them rewarded for your labor but in this case, it is not my primary issue. It is the hypocritical nature of company entirely based in IP law stealing IP protected work. I hate that the system is not ripping them into piece like Nintendo rips an online super smash tournament into pieces. It is so obviously “rules for thee, not for me”. You can claim that capitalism is causing that but I really don’t think capitalism requires this shit. Sure the rich and powerful are rich and powerful in capitalism because of capitalism, but special pledging for the elite existed in every system we have tried.

I hate ai because people invest in the dumbest applications for it. LLM are trash. Voice cloner??? Wtf. Image generation? Why?? But for medical applications in which we have comparably amazing clean data, let’s invest into that a little bit. But x billions into LLMs please.

I hate ai because the most brain dead application gets the most usage and people will tell you how it is bad but use it anyway. Then they obviously don’t have the computing power to run a decent local model and just pipe any personal or confidential information into the online service that tells you that the data will be used for training, so it can be leaking back out to other people.

I hate ai because it is literally everything bad about society (e.g. nonconsental nudes) and tech (e.g. data collectors) and their interaction.

There was a case in which a monkey took a picture and the owner of the camera wanted to publish the photo. Peta sued and lost because an animal can’t hold any copyright as an human author is required for copyright.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute

As you also find in the wikipedia article, this case is used to argue that ai generated content is not by an human author and consequently not copyrightable.

I think you mostly confirmed my understanding. Thanks for your input.

Take care and stay safe.

Seriously, based on what i heard grindr makes it really really really easy to hook up. Like based on what I was told, you can find someone for now.

Now I might be wrong… but I don’t think someone looking for a relationship (and 500 bucks per month to spend it like that) will struggle to find someone to date. And if my information is correct, hooking up would be even easier.

So why would someone spend 500bucks per month on that.

Gay people, I need your input. Is my information correct?

He tried to make money by producing cp with grok.

That statement is true, not hyperbolic. He knew people would use his ai to produce cp and he put a price tag on it.

He is effectively saying specialised ai has a possible future and llm are a huge waste of time and money. But he doesn’t know that he is saying that.

I want to remind everyone, what his reaction was:

He disabled the image generation! But!!! only for free users!!! He saw the CP and thought, I am fine with it if they pay me for it.

i know, adult victims are important too. But let’s focus on the children.

What do you do?

They knew […] is bad. they were told not to.

If they didn’t know what is good and bad, how would they have known that listening to the rules and following them, would have been good, and not doing so bad.

For a bit more complex form validation (ofc only for user convenience and not security), you need js.

“My understanding of art is that of a child”

Well it is an “analysis” and not a stated plan by European banks, as far as I know.

And it is about ai AND closing down physical branch… what a convenient things to group together…

So… I think this is ai propaganda. While I don’t think European banks are smarter than Americans…

I just explained to you how your own response confirms my point but be upset over someone making fun of you for stating the headline of their reference as some interesting insight.

You didn’t even bother to argue my point. You repeated the headline of the article that I send you. Are you sure that I need to learn that?

I would have given you a proper response if your response would have been. Calling something “controversial” is literally saying that there are conflicting opinions on the matter, which means it is NOT no brainer.

he just moved to types via JSDoc which is run through the TS compiler, as well as to .d.ts files.

Congratulations, you read the headline.

But “just” is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. It is literally why he moved.

https://devclass.com/2023/05/11/typescript-is-not-worth-it-for-developing-libraries-says-svelte-author-as-team-switches-to-javascript-and-jsdoc/

Some people disagree with it being a no brainer.

I am shocked!!! That someone needs to be told that.

Why is it broken when provisioning?

Also anyone who is running windows on even a small scale for a company has endless experiences of broken windows feature (admittedly long before ai) so Microsoft blaming the provisioning is also very misleading.

Ofc “windows uses ai, windows broken” is an insane simplification. But the absolutely fair critic is “windows stops having a qa team in 2014, and entirely depend on automated testing by the developers, windows starts to have more issues, windows starts to rely on more public testing, doesn’t fix the issue with lack of qa, windows uses ai to code, windows has noticeably more issues (i have gotten noticeably more complaints from end user about their PERSONAL devices at home), windows blames provisioning.” The no qa team company let ai write their QA tests and is surprised that their provisioning doesn’t work and ignores all the other issues with windows.

Yeah but that makes the whole thing so funny.