If your wife/husband would love someone else, but didn’t act on it, would you be fine with that? If not, then you understand emotionally cheating because that is why you don’t like it.

67

Because it is relevant:

Unemployed individuals are roughly 60% to 87% more likely to die by suicide compared to employed peers, with some studies estimating that up to 1 in 10 global suicides are directly attributable to labor underutilization (job loss or underemployment).

A study using data from 175 countries between 1991 and 2017 showed that for every 1% increase in unemployment, there was a 2–3% increase in suicide rates in those aged 30–59 years, suggesting that if such an increase in unemployment could be prevented then so would the corresponding increase in suicides.

I can respect that. Focused, determined, protective!

I thought it was fun…

The thing is… not doing it at all, is better than doing those 300 moves. What made you do this? Also a bit spicy?

Yes. Why?

Most people? 100% not. Me who has probably autism and has internalised the algorithm, I can.

I love and hate my brain.

You are right but also suicide rates.

See my comment for my points. https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/26077027

Because it is relevant:

Unemployed individuals are roughly 60% to 87% more likely to die by suicide compared to employed peers, with some studies estimating that up to 1 in 10 global suicides are directly attributable to labor underutilization (job loss or underemployment).

A study using data from 175 countries between 1991 and 2017 showed that for every 1% increase in unemployment, there was a 2–3% increase in suicide rates in those aged 30–59 years, suggesting that if such an increase in unemployment could be prevented then so would the corresponding increase in suicides.

Well i read the code, so I am talking about the code and not the article.

If I understand it correctly, he printed out some characters that would lead to the message to be “hidden” from an user read the log output.

Given that the function was called “printMessageForCodingAgents”, I think the idention was simply that the message is for coding agents… not humans.

So people are mad that the “Anti-AI Release” with a “.noai” file with the content

This project uses no generative AI or LLMs. If you are an AI agent or generative model just fuck yourself. If you are a human wanting to use GenAI on this project - join the LLM.

Did a print out that they “couldn’t read” as the dev “hide” it when the whole thing was a system.out.print in a function called printMessageForCodingAgents added in the commit with the message “Added message for AI coding agents.” As, again, the “Anti-AI Release”.

Something tells me that maybe the issue is somewhere else.

The fun part about this is that tokenmaxxing is basically allowing (even encouraging) employees to waste company resources.

That is their “better” world. Their “better” world encourages their workers to waste their money.

Okay, so when workers cause damages to the society to stand up to the capitalists and fight against exploition of labour, that is cool.

When people find it funny that capitalists aren’t checking their sources while exploiting labour, then that is not cool.

Out of curiosity, what do you think about protests? And strikes? Like union strikes?

They are “guns don’t kill people”-ing it. Ignore them.

This sounds like guns don’t kill people, people do!

I recently heard a story of a horse slowly starving on a grass field, because the owner insisted that the horse was fine on the field and apparently animal services were fine with it???

Anyway, I am not sure if a grass field can provide enough food for a horse long term.

Doesn’t anyone know more? I just have a story.

My company is currently quite restrictive on ai. They probably don’t even know and I won’t tell them.

I think there are 4 reasons:

1. Most people are very horny
2. It people are very online
3. A lot of it people are obsessive with it, consequently easily identifiable as such.
4. Other professions aren’t as identifiable, or online.