Proud anti-fascist & bird-person

  • 29 Posts
  • 200 Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月12日

help-circle








  • That’s really the heart of the matter: it’s so disrespectful to put in the effort to change an artist’s work just to remove the credit.

    My kids are artists, and they have their work stolen constantly. They don’t care about being paid, but it pisses them off when someone likes their work enough to repost it without the basic decency to post the whole thing.

    Beep is a bad netizen.


  • It’s supposedly a sequel to Run Hide Fight, which looks like a cynical cash-grab by grifters.

    So, a typical conservative project.

    Rotten Tomatoes scores

    It’s about how a teen fights back during a school shooting as a “good guy with a gun.” Even this glowing review makes it sound so terrible:

    Review

    Walked into it expecting nothing and it was probably one of the best movies I’d seen in a long time. Strong female lead, who was honestly a badass. It’s an action movie. It doesn’t push propaganda (anyone who believes that is literally looking for it) it isn’t overly deep (most action movies aren’t) and sure some parts were kind of like “seriously??” But so are parts of Die Hard. It’s about a girl struggling with grief and depression. She’s is able to save herself and her peers during a school shooting and her survival helps her realize what’s important in life. Definitely worth watching.

    The trailer makes it obvious that it’s a conservative fantasy of being in an active shooter situation. Jesus, these people are sick.




  • There are a couple parts of the court music book Orchésographie that I think would be particularly interesting for a bard character.

    Court musicians in the late 16th century frequently traveled to where the work was: either following a particular patron or looking to perform where they could. Most of the dances in the book are bransles, a folk dance popular with the “common people,” and formalized when brought to court. As a D&D bard, this would be a cool way to explain why your music is beloved by all, and why they could move in all social circles.

    There’s also a part at the beginning that explains how to play the drum and fife for a marching army: how to improvise a melody or change up the drum pattern while keeping the march going. It seems to imply that the court musicians the book was written for were potentially marching with armies, likely playing music in the camps or stops at night.






  • But I’m not sure how to reconcile that with modern “rightists” who want to burn down the system and aren’t conservative in the lowercase-C sense.

    The Republican party (and conservatism as a movement) are full-blown reactionaries. I like this passage from Corey Robin’sThe Reactionary Mind:

    People who aren’t conservative often fail to realize this, but conservatism really does speak to and for people who have lost something. It may be a landed estate or the privileges of white skin, the unquestioned authority of a husband or the untrammeled rights of a factory owner. The loss may be as material as money or as ethereal as a sense of standing. It may be a loss of something that was never legitimately owned in the first place; it may, when compared with what the conservative retains, be small. Even so, it is a loss, and nothing is ever so cherished as that which we no longer possess. It used to be one of the great virtues of the left that it alone understood the often zero- sum nature of politics, where the gains of one class necessarily entail the losses of another. But as that sense of conflict diminishes on the left, it has fallen to the right to remind voters that there really are losers in politics and that it is they— and only they— who speak for them. “All conservatism begins with loss,” Andrew Sullivan rightly notes, which makes conservatism not the Party of Order, as Mill and others have claimed, but the party of the loser.

    The chief aim of the loser is not— and indeed cannot be— preservation or protection. It is recovery and restoration.

    And from another section:

    There’s a fairly simple reason for the embrace of radicalism on the right, and it has to do with the reactionary imperative that lies at the core of conservative doctrine. The conservative not only opposes the left; he also believes that the left has been in the driver’s seat since, depending on who’s counting, the French Revolution or the Reformation. If he is to preserve what he values, the conservative must declare war against the culture as it is.