

They weren’t exactly subtle during the post-911 fascistic scramble.



They weren’t exactly subtle during the post-911 fascistic scramble.



The standing around with banners is supposed to carry an implicit threat:
“Deal amicably with us peaceful protesters, or you’re going to have to deal with people taking direct action.”
We’ve been educated to misunderstand this.
Just like we practised, teleport around at random and take up the whole frame when on camera.


There are people, it is true—nay, a great many people—who smile at such things, because they are not sensitive to noise; but they are just the very people who are also not sensitive to argument, or thought, or poetry, or art, in a word, to any kind of intellectual influence. The reason of it is that the tissue of their brains is of a very rough and coarse quality.


Doesn’t have the flash of UE
I’m guessing (I haven’t used UE) that’s largely because UE adds a lot of graphics effects for the dev by default whereas in Godot you start with more of a blank slate. So something made by an inexperienced dev will look better (and run poorly) in UE.
I don’t remember if they mentioned that explicitly in this vid:



Secure beneath the watchful eyes.
No not like that!
Impeachment and getting even aren’t priorities: They’re framing one of the key things they were elected for as childish and unnecessary.
I’m actually a little stunned they didn’t let voters enjoy the thought of whatever they imagined Democrats would do for a little while.


Something surprisingly few people get about AI is if it had any intelligence at all it would surpass us blindingly fast, no matter the starting point.
It’s never going to be in the news that thinking machines got 23% smarter over the last month or three.
There’s an old comic I wish I could locate that has people standing at a train platform awaiting superintelligence. Nothing happens, then someone staring down the track says I think I see- whoosh and it’s already gone.


I’ve had one lie to my face and the person next to me about what they said to us less than a minute prior.
It’s understandably difficult for people who haven’t experienced it to understand or believe it.
Courtesy of COVID I feel like a frustrated spectator dealing with poorer memory, and brain fog when I reach the limits of a much reduced intellectual stamina.


We can all decide the government should take their money, and politicians can do exactly what capital wants as always.


To be fair to them the default with “user friendly” phone UI makes it difficult to have any idea where things are. You often really have to go out of your way to open a file manager.


pre colour film announcer voice
The worker of the [year] 2000 will work just 20 hours per week
Oops, we forgot to account for employers existing.


Every company feels like they need to get faster.
Well yeah, they’re capitalist institutions. If they’re not growing exponentially, they’re failing.
That’s not a snarky mockery of the attitude of leadership, that’s the logic of capital.


If I’d only put off de-googling a bit longer before I saw the news I could have skipped this hop. Oh well…
I’m eyeballing Tuta. Anyone have other recommendations?


Give it a few generations for the selection pressure of the market / the temptations of new leadership to take over.


What would Machiavelli do? is a fine continuation of that energy.


… and it is only in so far as the appropriation of even more and more wealth in the abstract becomes the sole motive of his operations, that he functions as a capitalist, that is, as capital personified and endowed with consciousness and a will.
That’s what money does.
Exponential wealth and power consolidation is an emergent property.