This was 16-year-old me with The 13th Warrior. Thought it was pretty good. I have never watched it again, so I wonder if today’s me would say the same.

Definitely better than nothing, I just think researchers should more liberally give credit where it’s due, and although things are changing, I still see lots of people treat authorship like it’s some precious commodity.

Senior professor: Your work was instrumental in getting this published, and we think your efforts should be rewarded.

The reward: 👍

I’m a simple man. I see memes trashing Freud, I press like.

Putting energy into recreation is a good thing, a necessary thing.

It matters because, if you give in to their demands, some cats will learn that they only have to annoy you enough to get food, and they will be happy to repeat this at the earliest convenience.

This guy peer-reviews.

Ortographobia.

systemd is a great operating system, it just lacks a decent text editor.

That’s hilarious. I just love how AI is basically like a 6-year-old who weaves his favorite new expressions into everything without fully understanding what they mean.

If you’re having proportion of explained variance problems I feel bad for you son,
I got ninety nine problems but a fit ain’t one.

(⌐■_■)

I can see a Michelin star in this chef’s future.

Unless when you try to push them off of something. Then they turn massive and solid. Cats have non-newtonian properties.

deleted by creator

I think there’s still a difference between describing a concept in a way laypeople would understand and describing it using plain English. The latter is what I consider good scientific writing.

Is it really science, if it doesn’t sound like something Neil deGrasse Tyson would say to himself for 30 minutes straight in front of his bathroom mirror?

deleted by creator

I think you’re asking for a kind of nuance that most Info Warriors are unable to provide.

Up next on Info Wars: “They’re turning the mosquitoes gay!”

Source: Ethan Mollick (Beware: Xitter link)