Lemmy account of Voxel, for more information see:

  • 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 5th, 2026

help-circle
  • I’m tired of having to correct people, but I will do it anyway.

    Disagree, it serves to illustrate the same kind of monopoly google has one push notifications.

    This is wrong. If you look up the definition for monopoly, you will realize it is false. At worst, it’s a duopoly. If we exclude Huaweii Push, etc.

    UnifiedPush is not a push service, it is a distributor. It is a proxy for push services, it does not send out its own notifications.

    That is also wrong. Idk how you got the idea of it being a “proxy”.

    “UnifiedPush is a decentralized push notification system that lets you choose the service you want to use. It’s designed to be privacy-friendly, flexible, and open — making it perfect if you want control over your push notifications.”

    https://unifiedpush.org/








  • Software developer here, while I do not know everything about it, from what I observed and learned is following the case:

    • NewPipe has a component called NewPipe Extractor which is also used by most other opensource YT clients like LibreTube. From what I observed, it extracts the video URL for the stream without rly loading anything else of YouTube.
    • When you use YouTube in a browser, the entire YouTube page is loaded minus the content that has been blocked by Brave Shields, uBlock Origin or other utilities.

    I think privacy and security wise there is not a lot if not at all a difference, as both take a best effort approach to limit YT’s ads and tracking mechanisms.

    The only real difference is if you log in via e.g. Grayjay and on the website directly. Grayjay will only use your token to authenticate while necessary and not share all kinds of data with YT, while the website stores your watch history, search history, etc.