I’m relatively new to the linux space, I was introduced by the steam deck which uses kde, and it’s pretty similar to windows in terms of how it works so that’s the DE i’d be leaning towards when I eventually switch. I’ve never used gnome so i’m not sure if it’d be worth using I guess?

So I’m just looking for some input from the community, do you use Gnome or Plasma, why do you use it, and what’s kind of like a pros and cons kinda thing between the two?

    • richardisaguy@lemmy.world
      1·
      22 days ago

      after changing animation speed in KDE i have never managed to get back to gnome, holy cow does my computer feels responsive

  • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.todayEnglish
    282·
    23 days ago

    I like Plasma. It feels very modern and has an easy interface with lots of customization if wanted. It also supports Wayland and lots of HDR features. Overall it’s a cutting edge DE

    • insomnia@lemmy.ml
      2·
      23 days ago

      I haven’t been following the HDR news on Wayland lately, does this work across all Wayland compositors or just Plasma?

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.worldEnglish
    201·
    22 days ago

    I use KDE. It’s very powerful and flexible. While it can be windows like, you an also craft pretty much any GUI you like with it with relative ease. It can be Mac like or something unique, or even Gnome like if you really want that.

    It’s also intuitive and user friendly, with well made apps and a comprehensive settings menu.

    I’ve found KDE to be reliable and stable, as well as attractive and customisable.

    There are a lot of apps made for it - the only downside is software bloat if you install all of them. I’d start with the basics KDE desktop and add apps one by one rather than install the whole KDE app suite. Although the apps are usually excellent lots of the apps may not be useful to you personally . For example I don’t like installing the PIM suite (email, contacts etc) as I don’t use it - all that is online for me so I don’t need the native apps.

    I’m personally not a fan of Gnome. It’s got a single rigid GUI philosophy which you can now expand with extensions but I find they can be hit and miss on whether they work or are stable, and time consuming to set up how you want.

    So for gnome you either like it as is or you don’t, and if you dont like it then honestly I’d say don’t bother trying to make it be what you want - just use something more flexible.

    But regardless of what desktop you use, Apps will work on either or any of the others available.

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    225·
    23 days ago

    Gnome is my choice because it doesn’t look and feel like it was designed in 2015. I also much prefer the workflow with the touchpad gestures. I used to have extensions but since I reset my PC and didn’t install any apart from the one that shows my cpu temperature in the top bar.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    171·
    23 days ago

    KDE… Mostly sane defaults out of the box and tons of customization options if there’s anything you dont like.

  • verdigris@lemmy.ml
    193·
    22 days ago

    I use GNOME. KDE is nice in that it allows you to customize everything, but if I want that degree of control I’d rather use a fully customized window manager setup (sway is generally my go-to).

    GNOME is also designed to be used in a keyboard-centric workflow, which I prefer. It’s a nice comfy default for when I want the option to use my computer “lazily”, i.e. just kicking back mostly using the mouse to browse the web, but still has enough power-user functionality to make zipping around without touching the mouse feel good.

    I also just like their defaults a lot. If you start to install a bunch of third party extensions etc it starts to get messy and degrade the point of the whole unified vision, and at that point you’re better off with KDE IMO.

    It’s also worth noting that I don’t really like the default Mac OS UX – while I can see why people say “KDE is like Windows, GNOME is like Mac,” it’s really only a surface level comparison that mostly ends at “KDE uses a taskbar and GNOME has a dock”.

    • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
      3·
      22 days ago

      Gnome is so much more different, the closest comparison would be android but android is frankly a downgrade of gnome for me with how slow and clunky it is even with touch controls funnily enough

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    151·
    23 days ago

    Kde. I’d love to be able to give some erudite examples of why.

    Alas, the default is clean and works for me. It stays out of the way.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    141·
    23 days ago

    KDE.

    As a former Windows user myself, I find it to behave pretty much like how I’d expect, albeit some differences in details.

  • Fliegenpilzgünni@slrpnk.net
    142·
    23 days ago

    I use and love both. KDE (Bazzite) on my desktop gaming PC, and Gnome (Bluefin) on my laptop for casual stuff, mostly YouTube.

    KDE is a bit better for gaming since it has HDR and VRR and is the standard DE on the Steam Deck. I tried Gnome too just a few days ago, but it felt inferior in regards of gaming and content creation.

    Gnome on the other hand has a place reserved on my laptop aswell as in my heart. Especially the ultra smooth and well thought out touch gestures and minimalist UI makes it perfect for laptop usage.

    For me personally, I prefer Gnome over KDE. KDE is a bit more capable, but it overwhelms me sometimes. Gnome has a better concept and workflow for me. You either love or hate it, I do the first.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    164·
    23 days ago

    KDE Plasma. It makes sense to me and everything functions more or less how I prefer it to. If I need something, it’s usually easy enough to find. Plasma being flexible is a plus, but I rarely need to do any modifications.

    I loathe GNOME. Any time I use it it’s like pulling teeth. On a touch surface I can maybe get it, but on desktop I honestly think it has some serious usability problems cooked in. And since GNOME extensions can break at any time, trying to “fix” GNOME is a losing battle. If I had to use GNOME, I’d install GNOME Classic which is ok. Or better yet, use XFCE or MATE. GNOME is highly opinionated and that’s fair enough, they can do their thing and people seem to like what they offer, but boy is it not for me.

    • verdigris@lemmy.ml
      11·
      22 days ago

      GNOME on desktop is built for keyboard-centric workflows, it really shines when you don’t need to use the mouse. I’ll also say that the official extensions do not break, that’s why they’re official. Third party extensions can and do break and have weird wonky behavior, because they’re not up to the same standards.

      It’s certainly not for everyone, but a big part of the reason some people have such negative views of it is because they install a bunch of third party extensions to change it into something it was never designed for, and then inevitably there are bugs or conflicts or updates break some of them. A vanilla GNOME environment with maybe a couple judiciously picked third party extensions is a very comfy experience.

        • _donnadie_@feddit.cl
          1·
          19 days ago

          Nah I’m more into the main distros, they tend to have better support. Debian, Fedora are my main OSs, with Debian being what I use with old hardware that I still want to use on a daily basis, and Fedora for anything that’s new and might require a more up to date kernel.

    • bpt11@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      2·
      21 days ago

      I didn’t know it existed till making this post, as someone that’s new those are just the only two I hear about.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    11·
    22 days ago

    KDE if these are my choices & by a long shot.

    I usually cobble together my own tiling setup. This has less bloat, but also a lot less integration.