The second step, which we still need to evaluate because some companies want it, and others are more hesitant, is to allow Anatel to have access to the core routers to place a direct order on the router

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      They figure ports and IP addresses that link or distribute wares can be globally blocked and that will solve their problem.

  • april@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    How do they think that will work if the data is encrypted? We even have encrypted DNS now.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      Simple. After they gain access to the routers and realize everything is encrypted then they’ll start throwing piles of money at politicians to outlaw encryption.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Politicians finally figured out that everything not encrypted or with a backdoor is the same as giving everything to Chinese or Russian spies in a silver platter. It’ll take very large piles of money now.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      And let’s pretend for a second they can decrypt these packets. (Like let’s pretend they work with the CIA/NSA, who let’s say has some special key…) Even then, how are they going to determine that the sender and receiver do not have legit rights to own and/or transmit those bits? It’s fucking nuts.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Let’s don’t… The internet is important to keep open for everybody, or we become just like China with their “Great Firewall”… Yea… No thanks. When you go this route (pun intended), there is no going back, every industry would like to enforce bans on everything.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The control nexus points of the internet must have occasional cleansing burns to stop them becoming overgrown in our digital ecosystem. It is a permanent danger that any of these sites might become “to big to fail” and become corrupted by state actors. It’s simple hygiene, this article is a symptom of the infection taking root.

  • kadup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The source for the information in this article is a translated interview with a representative from Anatel, our local brazilian telecommunications regulator. Being brazilian, I can confidently say this means absolutely nothing, you can safely ignore this article, and the representative himself probably does not understand half of the words he used.

    It’s hard to even mention an entity as completely inadequate at their own job than Anatel.