HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programming Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoThey're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down13cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.devprogrammerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up189arrow-down1imageThey're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.lemmy.mlHiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programming Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square12linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.devprogrammerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarerockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·9 months agoWe’ve seen functional programming, now get ready for dysfunctional programming
minus-squareHiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 months agoAKA whenever I write something in a strictly functional-only language and think I’m ready but I’m just way too used to object oriented to get it.
minus-squarestupidcasey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 months agoIsn’t that just unstructured programming?
We’ve seen functional programming, now get ready for dysfunctional programming
AKA whenever I write something in a strictly functional-only language and think I’m ready but I’m just way too used to object oriented to get it.
Isn’t that just unstructured programming?