1. Does this mean sideloading is going away on Android?

Absolutely not. Sideloading is fundamental to Android and it is not going away. Our new developer identity requirements are designed to protect users and developers from bad actors, not to limit choice. We want to make sure that if you download an app, it’s truly from the developer it claims to be published from, regardless of where you get the app. Verified developers will have the same freedom to distribute their apps directly to users through sideloading or through any app store they prefer.

  1. Making APKs available to your test team

If your team’s current test process relies on distributing APKs to testers for installation using methods other than adb, you will need to verify your identity and register the package. This also applies if you make APKs available to your test teams through Google Play Internal Testing, Firebase App Distribution, or similar solutions through other distribution partners.

  1. Do I still need to register my apps if I’m only distributing to a limited number of users?

We recommend you register. It’s a simple, one-time process that will allow anyone to download and install your app. However, if you prefer not to, we are also introducing a free developer account type that will allow teachers, students, and hobbyists to distribute apps to a limited number of devices without needing to provide a government ID.

  1. What can I do to prepare for developer verification?

The best way to get ready and stay updated is to sign up for early access. We’ll start sending invitations in October.

We recommend you participate in developer verification because, even though verification is not required to develop apps with Android Studio, you will need it to distribute apps to certified Android devices. Apps installed through enterprise management tools on managed devices will also be installable without being registered.

  • Netrics@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    All I heard was is “COMPLY”. Yeah, no thanks. I will keep my shades on.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Sundar the creep now gonna be approving what apps you can install on your hardware

    Never trust a rapist…

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago
    1. Does this mean sideloading is going away on Android?

    Absolutely not. Your sideloaded app will simply refuse to run if the developer has not verified themselves with Google. This will cause any older app that is no longer updated to fail, as well as any apps by developers whom dislike Google’s repeated monopolistic behaviour, and opt-out of the program. In short, most apps currently sideloaded will no longer be able to. We call this ‘sideload rightsizing’. We will also be keeping users safe by suing the developers of apps we don’t like, such as Grayjay, FreeTube, NewPipe, Shizuku, and Magisk - this will be much easier with their government IDs showing their legal names and addresses.

    Ftfy Google.

  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    You could do what I did and let them know via feedback that you’ll be leaving for Apple since its the same thing now.

    I won’t actually be going to apple, but to a linuxphone, but saying Apple is probably going to have more impact so I went with that.

    Edit: This is feedback to them linked in that page.

    If you have a dev account, I recommend using it to give them feedback.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If we’re talking about loading apps - as in the subject of this post - pretty much exactly the same. Registered developer account, a walled garden ecosystem, etc.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          Not at all

          Android still has way more flexibility that iOS will ever have. App verification is very much a step in the wrong direction but it isn’t nearly as locked down as iOS.

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Is it relevant to complaining to google about their stupid decision they are trying to brush off as if it were nothing?

            Because I assume you (and others) are missing the entire point of my comment.

            There is a feedback form linked directly in the blog post. Use it. Let them know this would impact their income.

            • darkkite@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              it would have to get much worse in order for an android enthusiast to move to a worse platform for developers.

              they would rather go full linux than ios

              • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Sounds familiar… oh, right, from my comment this entire chain is from.

                I won’t actually be going to apple, but to a linuxphone, but saying Apple is probably going to have more impact so I went with that.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Getting off with just a wrist slap on their monopoly trial has embolden them. They think they’re untouchable now. I wouldn’t be surprised they have a backroom deal with the feds too.

  • limerod@reddthat.comOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    After all that outcry. They only wrote about devs demanding longer. Conveniently ignoring fdroid’s post among others.

    Even for hobby projects you would be required to create a limited developer account and submit government identification if you want to distribute apps to a larger audience.

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you want to distribute an app to a larger audience you should be willing to do so. Sure you could say it’s everyone’s personal risk installing an unsigned app on their phone, but making these people compile the app themselves isn’t too much to ask for. Tools to automate this to the max will appear.

  • surjomukhi@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    How about let me know if the apk is from a verified publisher or show me “unknown publisher” and let me decide do i put it into my device.