While some viewers may have previously enjoyed the extended version of Have I Got News For You, we must consider what works best for both BBC One and BBC iPlayer. As a result, we’ll be focusing on delivering audiences the best possible version of the show.

  • TWeaK@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bull-fucking-shit. This is simply cost cutting, when they really need to be firing all their overpaid biased presenters and the upper management installed by Tories.

    In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if this is something of an attack by the same management on the likes of Ian Hislop.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      The real problem is the License fee has been fixed in place and used as a political foot ball for years.

      The current license fee is £174.50. In 2010 it was £145.50. Sounds like it’s gone up - but actually inflation has been rolling away - the 2010 license fee should be £226.72 now.

      So in reality the license fee has been cut by 30% over the last 15 years. It is no wonder the BBC is constantly having to cut back - costs have gone up with inflation for them as for everyone else, but it’s income has not. They’re at the point where they’re so desperate even small cuts like this are seen as worthwhile.

      Politicians get away with this crap as people don’t understand inflation. The same nonsense goes on with pay for public sector workers like Doctors and Nurses, and even the budget for Health and Education etc.

      The only thing that is actually indexed linked is… Pensions. Surprise surprise, tory voters incomes are income protected while everyone else in society is not.

    • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Worth considering that it’s shit as cost-cutting too. The live episodes are still longer than either TV format, and historically, it’s been edited down into a 30 minute version and a 45 minute version.

      By cutting out the 45 minute version, what are they really saving beyond a few hours of editing work for a freelance video editor and a bit of hard drive space?

      Anyway, if it’s shit as cost cutting, I guess that makes your other points a bit more likely.

      • TWeaK@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, the bulk of the cost is actually running the live show, the cost of an editor is relatively low. Then, the difference in cost between an editor making two cuts and making one cut is pretty negligible.