• CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    How does this affect my Galaxy S10 from 2019 which hasn’t seen an update in years? I suspect it doesn’t. Not trying to be a smartass — I know I should change it out for something like an A25 that is still supported and probably a little faster, but I have this and it still works.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    So it’s on the same scale as buying a gun in the states.

    I didn’t realise it was so dangerous.

  • sours@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s so weird that they don’t take comments on the android developer blog post… Almost like they think it’ll be hugely unpopular.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      They changed their “don’t be evil” motto years ago. I guess they must have kept two thirds of it.

      • omarfw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        A motto was never going to stop them from going sour. Any corporation that gets large enough and is publicly traded is going to attract sociopaths, narcissists and other Patrick Bateman wannabes to the positions of leadership within the corp like sharks to chum. It is a matter of when that gradual shift from good people to bad people takes place, not if.

        The problem is that our economy and corporate structures reward the scummiest people because they’re the best at making profits.

    • lb_o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It feels that it is either Linux phones, or Fairphone, or GrapheneOS. We are somewhat fucked.

          • Reference4054@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Unfortunately, I don’t think most people are too interested even now. The masses that buy phones and make it profitable aren’t aware of things like this or even give a shit. Any time I bring something up with friends and family it gets shrugged off. Realistically Linux phones are going to be fringe unless they can offer something up to the masses that is attractive to them.

            Hope I’m wrong.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          Same with what we were hearing about the Linux desktop!

          …yet here we are in 2026 and literally all my desktops have since become Linux, lol.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think anything other than degoogled Android is mature enough to recommend. And it looks like degoogled androids might extinct soon.

      • Lemmyng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        What makes you say Degoogled Android might go extinct? Projects like LineageOS and GrapheneOS are still going strong. /e/OS, murenaOS, VollaOS and other similar phones have been coming out of the woodwork recently. I think DeGoogled Android is just getting started.

        That is, unless, you mean Google is working hard to close down AOSP so the downstream DeGoogled projects don’t function anymore? Then yeah, I sadly have to agree.

    • Chaser@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’ve preordered my jolla phone a few weeks ago. It will arrive around september. Let’s hope it don’t suck 😉

  • vortexal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    While I understand that Google probably hasn’t provided the answers yet, I have two questions about this. First, will I need to setup a pin for my devices? I don’t normally use any form of a lock screen on my devices and I’d prefer to continue not having them but I know from personal experience that some android devices don’t allow you to remove the lock screens after you set them up.

    Second, during the 24 hour waiting period, is the device still usable? I know this might sound like a stupid question but Google’s vague wording has me wondering.

  • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 day ago

    To those who think it is a fair compromise: It is not.

    Android already had one layer of this shit before. When installid freshly dowloaded apk, android would prompt you to confirm that the source of the apk is trusted. This was not like this before. Before you’d just install apk.

    And I agree to a certain amount. But thing is, it was added for no specific reason. People who install apks form outside source, will keep doing it and they 99% of the time know what they are doing or being told to do so by someone who knows what they are doing.

    Adding another layer to this wont solve the problem, except make users annoyed for 24h wait time. And this is only adding 1 layer now. Who the fuck knows what is going to be 1 year later. 5 years later?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No one thinks this is fair. Little old grannys don’t side load apps, so they don’t need protection.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    How about a 24 hour waiting period for me to harden my OS before Google slurps up all my data.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    In these scenarios, scammers exploit fear – using threats of financial ruin, legal trouble, or harm to a loved one – to create a sense of extreme urgency. They stay on the phone with victims, coaching them to bypass security warnings and disable security settings before the victim has a chance to think or seek help.

    Does this actually happen? Or they just trying to manufacture consent to all this bullshit?

    • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do calls like that happen? Unfortunately, yes.

      Is it a reason to lock down and enshittify every computing platform, every OS, every Internet-connected device until we own nothing, control nothing and can’t install what we please?

      It’s an age old tactic of manipulation to start with something true, exaggerate the threat, and apply it everywhere possible.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        age old

        Yeah for sure. I have to deal with a lot of tech-support and similar scam victims, and I always wind up explaining that this con is as old as civilization at least, it’s just the location and props that are new.

        Lure you in with a benefit or problem solved, ensure that you get lost or disoriented, manufacture fear/uncertainty/doubt, offer a way out, trap is set.

        Once upon a time I had someone try to run this same scam on me in meatspace, a big ancient city. Offer a solution to a logistics problem, get me lost in the maze, create new problem of changed conditions, intimidate with new people arriving, and pressure with intense sales tactics on a bullshit product. I wasn’t actually lost so just walked away, curiosity satisfied, but some people would have lost a lot of money.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Never seen it and I’ve worked in banking which I would have thought it would be most prevalent. Seen lots of traditional scams, but never stuff that involves side loading apps. I think the attack surface is just not big enough to make it worthwhile.

    • moopet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well I’m sure we’ve all heard stories about it happening, and my FIL had someone walking him through a “Microsoft has detected a virus on your PC” scenario one time until he fucked up and lost the connection (fortunately)

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 day ago

    This would make sense if google play store wasnt full of malware. Scammers dont need you to sideload malicious apps they just get you to download it from the play store.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Googles half the malware themselves.

        Cant install (random app name here, since we cant use X anymore as a generic thanks to musk and his 13 year old obsession with naming everything X) app, without having 1500 different google bullshit data trackers installed.

    • pool_spray_098@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is GrapheneOS a good enough alternative?

      I am very interested in switching to that when their phone comes out… But I wish pure Linux were viable.

        • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          One of my banking apps (Citi) didn’t even work in stock Android on a Pixel. It thinks I’m rooted lol.

          Everything works well enough in the browser though. Nowadays I just do all that stuff on a desktop PC. Not everything needs to be an app or even done on a phone.

          The desktop versions of bank websites have everything I need, whereas mobile versions can skip out on certain features. Plus, these apps tend to hoard perms for “security” reasons, or so they say.

          If you have a strong password and legit MFA (like TOTP or a physical key), use a trusted device/browser that’s good enough. There shouldn’t be a need to grab my location or nearby devices.

          Bonus points if the bank lets you review login sessions and deauth devices, flags things like impossible travel, etc.

          Credit unions tend to do better. DCU is one example. They excel at security, don’t do any silliness with perms in their app, let you review logins and devices, and have a strong MFA implementation. The big private national players just want to sell you to data brokers to pad their margins while you pay ridiculous interest rates on their crappy products and get nothing in return.

          • eleitl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I use the browser with a hardware TAN generator, though my bank’s app works fine on GOS.