I was considering buying a Chevy Bolt lately to use as my daily commuter but found out it collects a lot of data and phones it back. It’s hard to do research on what kind of EV I could buy that doesn’t collect your location data so I’m hoping someone here might have some good suggestions.

  • robolemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    No such animal exists. They’re all rolling data collection machines.

    https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-on-wheels-every-car-brand-reviewed-by-mozilla-including-ford-volkswagen-and-toyota-flunks-privacy-test/

    I drive a bolt. To somewhat minimize the GM evil, I don’t have the GM app installed and I didn’t give the Bluetooth connection access to anything but Apple CarPlay. Of course if you’re a real privacy purist, you don’t have a smartphone and don’t use Bluetooth anyway.

    If you want a car with privacy, you’ll have to buy an old car without a computer.

    • flappy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you remove their cellular mouths, they won’t be able to scream.

    • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you want a car with privacy, you’ll have to buy an old car without a computer.

      Or you could just get a bicycle and be free

      • jecht360@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Computer - yes, in the technical term. Traditional car ECUs don’t gather data, GPS, driving habits, etc. and phone home though. Also, as another user said, the regulations starting in 96 were for OBD2 ports. Cars already had computers before then.

        • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          In addition, the issue is arguably less the collection of data, and more the ability for the car to actually send that data somewhere.

          • Alto@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yep. You want the car to collect telementry data for help in diagnosing issues as needed. That’s not at all the issue, and nobody would be mad if the companies treated the data with respect.

            Unfortunately that’s not going to happen unless legislation forces it to.

            E: sp

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Don’t pretend you don’t understand the distinction between what was ostensibly mandated in '96 and what we currently have

      • Pirky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Cars have been required to have an OBDII port to access vehicle diagnostics since 1996*

  • Pirky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wonder if anyone has tried “jailbreaking” their EV’s and running custom OS’s on it to get rid of the spyware.
    Would most likely void the warranty, but still.

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Probably not. You can modify cars pretty extensively and insurance doesn’t care. As long as it’s road legal, which is a very low bar in most states. There have been ECU mods forever and those are still covered.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Locking your keys in a car and calling Pop-a-Lock voids everything afaik, so probably. But still is an interesting spot, possibly sweet.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is a great question, and as far as I know, the other answers are correct, you’re not going to stop any modern vehicles from publishing at least some information.

    Aptera nominally seems to be more focused on consumer rights than other ev companies, but I can’t even tell if they’re in full production yet and also they’ll probably still record at least location and safety statistics.

    I know a guy who sticks with his older firebird because it has zero microchips. He’s coincidentally an addict illegally overstaying his visa and missing a lot of teeth, plus the last three repairs cost more than the car is worth, but no gubbermint is going to find out he drove to Fresno.

      • uphillbothways@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Haven’t they been a year away from production since like 2009? I stopped following their developments at some point because it had been long enough back then.

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          They did have some unreasonable promises when they first started.

          But now they’re making their production intent cars. These are like 99% similar to what the production line will look like.

          They’re looking to have done all or most of their crash testing and safety tests before this time next year. If the planets align, there might be actual cars delivered to customers some time in 2025.

  • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I posted this when the same question got asked on site-that-shall-not-be-named:

    I bought a Suzuki Swift. As best I can tell, there is no GPS or cellular radio. Higher specs come with GPS but I think still no cellular.

    The NZ privacy policy is very good but is really only referring to service information and the website.

    The global privacy policy is still mostly focused on service/dealer information and the website, with a note that they might receive medical information if one of their vehicles is involved in a crash.

    The infotainment system (at least this one) comes from Directed Electronics, who again have a privacy policy that appears to be focused on using the website and directly selling things.

    There is a section in the manual about ‘Vehicle Data Recordings’ which says that “these data are exclusively technical” and appears to be a reference to fault codes and crash black-boxes.

    There is a Suzuki Connect app that has a privacy policy, which appears to include the ‘usual’ speed/location/mileage/braking/acceleration, but not the more ridiculous stuff like audio or video, and also says it won’t be sold.

    Of course, they’re not available in the US. You might be able to get one from Mexico? Not sure about legality.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can someone explain exactly how a car is a privacy nightmare? Like what data does it collect and how does it transmit it? Does it have GPS? Is it recording audio somehow? Is it transmitting over cellular data? Verizon, T-mobile? Who’s paying that data bill, Toyota?

    I just don’t get it.

    My RAV4 has Android Auto, but I don’t have a Toyota app on my phone or anything so how would toyota get stuff from my phone?

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Look into what it takes to disable that “feature”. Brief web searching just now showed me that at least on some vehicles, you can locate and disable the modem either by pulling a fuse, or disconnecting antennae.