Personal Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 7 months ago

Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything?

slrpnk.net

message-square
117
link
fedilink
901

Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything?

slrpnk.net

ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 7 months ago
message-square
117
link
fedilink
  • StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    ·
    7 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      7 months ago

      Probably kiddie porn.

      • Shellbeach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          7 months ago

          “I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast”

          • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            7 months ago

            You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird…

          It’s the best read of it I can manage though…

        • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nah bro. He’s just copped to tryna fuck kids. Just republican shit.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write “you would be my bitches”. Not polite, MAGA polite.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

          I don’t know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it’s because I’m not into any sketchy shit.

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s the step between mistress and partner.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Oh…yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

              At least with mistress’s and partners consent is a key factor.

              • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

                It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage

          • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s an old term for a pleasure slave.

            • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              No, concubinage was typically consensual.

              • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                7 months ago

                By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I’m trying to remember the exact quote, but I’ll paraphrase it here: ‘In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.’ https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.

              • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Historically consent has often been quite optional, when it comes to marriage, concubinage, and the like…

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re right. It doesn’t make logical sense.

      Oh, I meant you. You just tried to read a tweet where a republican just admitted to being a pedo, and your first instinct was to try to follow the logic.

      That corse of action doesn’t make logical sense!

      • StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Isn’t it though?

    • Bongles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      My best guess is that by social media he means because they’re online, not around him?

Political Weirdos @lemmy.world

political_weirdos@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !political_weirdos@lemmy.world

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

  • Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
  • Follow Iemmy.world TOS
  • Don’t be a jerk
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 5 users / day
  • 37 users / week
  • 428 users / month
  • 4.69K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 950 subscribers
  • 250 Posts
  • 7.98K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org