The idea feels like sci-fi because you’re so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.

The traditional argument pro-advertising—that it provides consumers with necessary information—hasn’t been valid for decades.

  • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve had adblockers on my browsers for years and pay for ad-free streaming. I easily went over a decade without seeing an ad on a screen in my own home. But when I’d go to a restaurant that had TVs (or to my mom’s house where she’d run the TV constantly) I’d marvel at how unwatchable it was. Just a constant interruption.

    My wife has a friend who produced a TV series for Tubi and so we signed up to check it out and, wow. I had to tap out of watching it because of the ads. Just completely obnoxious and loud.

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    #YES, PLEASE.

    I have been fighting advertising in my own way since the early 2000s:

    • I abandoned broadcast radio in the mid-1990s. I can’t recall the last time I turned on a car radio.
    • I abandoned broadcast TV in 2001
    • I jumped on board with Adblock the moment it was released for Phoenix (now Firefox) back in 2004
    • The lone streaming service I actually subscribe to is the cheapest non-advertising tier available
    • Torrenting covers many of the remaining gaps
    • Even my Internet Radio stations are chosen primarily through lack of advertising.

    It’s gotten to the point where stumbling across an ad is the mental equivalent to nails on a chalkboard.

  • blorps is here@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The thing is I don’t think I would mind advertising if it wasn’t shoved down my throat 24/7. The fact I can’t read a webpage without ads blocking everything, I can’t watch TV without more than half of the show’s runtime being ads in and out of segments, I can’t even step outside without seeing the billboard or another 5 ads shoved in my mailbox!

    I get 15 some-odd emails a day from different companies trying to get me to buy things. I block them and they pop up with a different email address. I can’t even open my email without ads popping up masquerading as actual messages (Gmail). Don’t get me started on the entire Google app thing.

    I can’t open an online map without getting SPONSERED listings. And places I use the app to order from try to advertise me their own food WHILE I’M ORDERING. Panda Express started asking me if I want a subscription to Starz or whatever.

    NO. NO. NO.

    I’m exhausted. I want to go to a store without being immediately inundated with ads or sellers. “Buy this!” NO. LEAVE ME ALONE.

    I’m overwhelmed. I’m overstimulated. I’m done. I don’t care how “quirky” or “flashy” or “hip” your ads are. I refuse to buy anything I see ads for now. It’s too much. Shut up.

    TL;DR: we need controls and limits to who, what, where, and how things are advertised. It should be an enforcable crime to have ads louder than a certain decibel for one. But it’s not enforced and fines aren’t more than a drop in the bucket. I doubt I’ll see it in ny lifetime.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    As I sat down this morning to enjoy my warm and full-flavored Folger’s coffee, it got me thinking: traditional advertising might disappear, but something sneakier would inevitably fill the void: product placement.

  • isaacd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Online communities” are great, but how do you stop them from being infiltrated by corporate astroturfers within five minutes of creation? Doesn’t every major brand have a low-overhead keyboard farm posting social media and forum comments to make them look good?

  • O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just making billboards ads illegal. It would make every city and the places in-between instantly better

  • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let’s ban all persuasive advertising! No reason not to let people make a list of features or something, like a notification, but that’s it.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even with an adblock and the best privacy controls available, you cannot escape the effects of advertising. Article headlines will still be clickbait. Online recipes will still have long, unnecessary stories at the start. Companies will still want your email for trivial things so they can spam you. There are a hundred ways that advertising affects culture, and it’s not something that can change based on individual effort.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would argue that what this article is advocating for isn’t a definitive end to advertisement per se. Truthfully that would be impossible.

    What we truly need are iron clad privacy laws that impose unbreakable regulations with destructive fines when violated by companies and organizations.

  • Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    OTA tv would no longer be possible, nor radio AM or FM.
    Newspapers (what is left of them) would no longer be possible, neither wouild magazines.
    A good deal of the internet is supported by ads too.
    If you are willing to give up everything that is supported by ads, I suppose it could work.

  • Robbity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    People talk about tech giants, but Facebook and Google are actually advertising giants. They pour much more money into their advertising than they do into r&d.

    Many brands have a cost structure where, for each product sold, more money goes to advertising than to the person who actually made the product. Sometimes 2 or 3 times more. That’s where the battle for attention is taking us, a place where attention from customers is worth much more than the effort of the worker.

    None of this is inevitable, advertising should be heavily taxed and regulated.

  • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 days ago

    The economy should exist to serve real needs of the people. All that advertisement does is create a fake desire for consumption which simply wastes respurces.

    • Lyrl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is some awareness effect, too. If I like burgers and see a listing for a new burger place in my neighborhood, learning about a potential new place I’d like to include in my going-out rotation feels like a win. If I need a home repair and see a neighbor with a yard sign for a local contractor, that’s helpful in compiling a list of potential companies to check out.

      • onnekas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It would be totally sufficient if those things are listed in search engines or maps. Not as ads for other searches but as actual results when you actually search for that stuff. If you like burgers it would be no problem for you to type “burger near me” into your favourite search engines once in a while if you feel like something new. Same for home repair etc.

      • Grazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        What about word of mouth? If I want to find a good place to eat, I find asking a local “hey what’s the best restaurant around here?” to yield way better results than ads.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Getting rid of advertising in a capitalist society would be devastating for all new and small businesses. Start an IT company, tow truck company, Trash removal, plumber, electrician, pest, all dead. Really any company that isnt already known would likely die, and the current large companies would be the only ones that exist. Also what counts as advertising, am I going to jail for telling my friend about a new game I tried? That’s advertising.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re absolutely right. Any small business left would beg big corporations for buyouts, for pennies on the dollar. Small time influencers would skirt it by the millions. It’d make cyberpunk fiction look tame.

        It might be better if some “standard catalog” was popularized, but still a calamity.

      • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        There used to be a business catalog book called “yellow pages”. Now there are map applications, price comparison sites, customer review sites, and keyword search engines. All of those make advertisements unnecessary.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s advertising. The entire phone book was a sold adventure. Jail, prison, what is the punishment for advertising. I think people have forgotten what advertising is. I ask you you favorite movie, you answer, advertising. If you tell me Lemmy is a decent place, advertising. Any app, game, movie, music, software, hardware, car, plant, advertising. Stop talking about any object if you want ALL advertising to be illegal as the description says

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see advertising as a necessary evil. It helps small businesses take off and stay afloat (especially when alternatives for being funded aren’t viable for them), but at the same time it basically promotes corporate greed by shoving ads down our throats.

    Abolishing advertising entirely would be improbable. I just want it to be toned down to the point where we’re all comfortable with it. Too much of a good thing inevitably becomes a bad thing. But too little of a good thing is also a bad thing. So things should be taken in moderation. In the case of advertising, the first statement applies; there’s way too much of it, it’s really in-your-face and disruptive, and we’re all getting sick of it.