• FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I hear you. I’d still be hesitant to let school age kids learn with an LLM companion. If the grownups think they’re talking with a sentient gigabyte, I think the danger is too great to expose kids to this. Which brings me to my big picture opinion: the general public doesn’t need to have access to most of these models. We don’t need to cook polar bears alive to make 5 second video memes, slop, or disinformation. You can just read your emails. No one needs ChatGPT plan their next trip. No one should consider an LLM a substitute for a trained therapist. There are good applications in the field of accessibility, probably medical as well. The rest can stay in a digital lab until they’ve worked out how not to tell teenagers to kill themselves, not to eat rocks to help your digestion, or insert any other bullshit so-called AI headline you have read recently here. It’s not good for people, the environment, and it’s forming a dangerous bubble that will have shades of subprime mortgages 2007/8 when it bursts. The negatives outweigh the positives.

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You need to be able to think critically to use an LLM as an effective research tool and children in schools fuckjng suck at that, so I agree with you.

      But now that I think about it - they could be a good way to actually teach critical thinking.

      We NEED to be raising a generation of relentless critical thinkers if we don’t want to slip into facism, and we are doing an absolutely shit job of it.